Richard Hempel

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Hempel and the Flagpole

A standard counterexample to Hempel’s Deductive-Nomological (D-N) model of explanation is the example of the flagpole and its shadow. In this example, it is shown that the DN model allows one to explain the height of a flagpole by reference to the length of its shadow (in conjunction with other background premises). Because this seems intuitively unacceptable as an explanation, this example is ...

متن کامل

Goodman, 'grue' and Hempel*

It is now commonly accepted that N. Goodman's predicate "grue" presents the theory of confirmation of C. G. Hempel (and other such theories) with grave difficulties. The precise nature and status of these "difficulties" has, however, never been made clear. In this paper it is argued that it is very unlikely that "grue" raises any formal difficulties for Hempel and appearances to the contrary ar...

متن کامل

HEMPEL , GOOD , and BAYES

This paper analyzes some decision and belief paradoxes from a Bayesian viewpoint, focusing on Hempel's "paradox of confirmation" and Good's variation thereof. It is shown that a straightforward Bayesian analysis resolves the paradoxes discussed. These examples are used to support the view that the Bayesian paradigm is a very effective tool for providing a coherent and intuitive representation o...

متن کامل

3 Carl Hempel , " Two Models

Carl Gustav Hempel 's (19051997) classic account of explanation is widely known as the "cover ing-law model. " It includ es two species : the Deductive-Nomological Expla nation and the Probabilistic-Statist ical Explanation . Since its introduction in the semi nal pape r co-authored by Hempel and Paul Oppenheim (1948), the model has been intense ly debated and criticized in the philosophy of sc...

متن کامل

Hempel and the Paradoxes of Confirmation

The beginning of modern philosophy of science is generally associated with the label of logical empiricism, in particular with the members of the Vienna Circle. Some of them, as Frank, Hahn and Neurath, were themselves scientists, others, as Carnap and Schlick, were philosophers, but deeply impressed by the scientific revolutions at the beginning of the 20th century. All of them were unified in...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Sønderjydske Årbøger

سال: 2010

ISSN: 0106-4452

DOI: 10.7146/soenderjydskeaarboeger.v122i1.81348